Is CAD the only Option?
If you ask any mechanical engineer today what software they use to design physical objects, the answer will almost certainly be one of the mainstream CAD (Computer-Aided Design) programs. These tools have become the standard in the industry for good reason—they are practical, visually intuitive, and relatively easy to learn. CAD software allows engineers to create detailed 3D representations of parts and assemblies, facilitating the design and development process.
However, the limitations of CAD become apparent when we consider the broader scope of what it takes to bring a functional part from concept to reality. Designing a mechanical component is not merely about crafting a 3D model; it involves simulating the physical characteristics of the part, ensuring it meets all requirements, assessing the availability of resources, verifying manufacturability, and addressing numerous other considerations. In other words, CAD focuses heavily on the “representation” aspect of design, but the future demands more—much more.
The Next Step?
Imagine a workflow where the design process is not confined to a single piece of software but is instead distributed across various specialized modules, each representing a particular function or filter. One module could handle structural simulations, another could focus on 3D geometry generation, and yet another could benchmark the design against industry standards or specific requirements. These modules would operate like a team of engineers, each responsible for a specific aspect of the design process, collaborating to meet predefined milestones.
This vision of the future involves a network of interconnected agents, each specializing in a specific domain. These agents would interact with the user, continuously adjusting input and output parameters to optimize the design. The system would be fluid, capable of dynamically reconfiguring its internal structure to address the unique challenges of each project. This approach goes far beyond the model-driven design (MDD) we know today. It’s a flexible, adaptive system that evolves to meet the needs of the task at hand.
How To Build It?
Currently, many researchers and professionals are working on this problem, but there is no consensus on the best approach. Should we begin by automating 3D generation, or would it be more effective to start with automating requirement engineering? The path forward is uncertain, and different approaches may be needed to address the complex challenges of modern engineering.
However, one thing is clear: a paradigm shift is inevitable. The industry recognizes that the traditional CAD-centric workflow is not sufficient to meet the demands of the future. The next generation of design tools will need to be more holistic, integrating various aspects of engineering into a cohesive, adaptive system.
Conclusion
The disappearance of traditional CAD software is not about rendering obsolete a useful tool but rather about evolving beyond it. As engineering challenges grow more complex, the tools we use must also evolve. The future lies in modular, adaptive systems that integrate multiple aspects of the design process into a seamless, intelligent workflow. These systems will enable engineers to focus not just on creating a 3D representation but on designing parts and systems that are optimized, manufacturable, and fully aligned with the project’s goals.
In this future, CAD as we know it will dissolve into the background, replaced by a more sophisticated, interconnected approach to design. It’s not about discarding the old but embracing the new, ensuring that our tools grow in sophistication as our challenges do. This shift is not just possible—it’s necessary. And as we move toward this future, the details of how we get there will become clear, shaped by innovation and the relentless pursuit of excellence in design.
Join Us on This Journey
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated on our progress, new features, and exclusive insights.
Feel free to reach out if you’re interested in integrating KATALYST into your workflow, or discuss use-cases we could develop together.